Validation impacts every process and component of pharmaceutical production, including machines, systems, equipment and computer systems, explains Bart Vansteenkiste from Domino Printing Sciences
Validation impacts every process and component of pharmaceutical production, part of the validation process is in the documentation; there needs to be integrated support for documentation with 100% clarity and traceability.
In today’s supply chain, the printer is arguably the final element in the validation process; and, with regulatory complexity increasing — not to mention industry wide moves towards just-in-time production processes — no organisation can afford to omit this final stage of compliance.
Yet, the unfortunate reality is that many organisations may not realise that their printer validation packs are incomplete and therefore do not meet US FDA regulatory requirements. With the considerable risk and implications of non-compliance, Bart Vansteenkiste, Life Science Sector Manager at Domino Printing Sciences, outlines how pharmaceutical companies can ensure their user requirement specification (URS) covers the final element of the production process.
Good manufacturing practice (GMP) validation is an essential part of quality assurance that underpins the safety of pharmaceutical and biotech products and processes as set out, initially, by the US FDA. It’s now widely adopted by regulatory bodies all over the world, such as Europe’s EMA and the UK’s MHRA.
Increasingly, other international regulators have followed suit, including Australia’s TGA and India’s Schedule M, with new regulatory requirements concerning pharmaceutical serialisation due to come into force in Russia (1 January 2020), Brazil and Indonesia (2021) and China (2022) that will further impact the pharmaceutical supply chain.
Bart Vansteenkiste, Life Science Sector Manager at Domino Printing Sciences
The risk of non-compliance is significant. From the potential regulatory fines and loss of brand reputation to the temporarily forced shutdown of a full production line and the cost of remediating the situation, not having validated systems and processes in place could have a potentially catastrophic impact on any business.
Every pharmaceutical manufacturer will be aware of the requirement for GMP validated products and processes, whereby the company has to demonstrate in a documented form that the processes, methods, tests, activities and equipment they deploy are capable of repeatedly producing the desired product.
Therefore, each critical step in the manufacturing process must be validated to perform as intended under defined conditions. The documentation associated with validation includes:
Labelling and label printing are critical final components of the validation process. In 2018, 9% of all medical device recall events — and the return of more than a million units — were because of labelling issues (with printing errors undoubtedly a factor). It only takes one stray label, instructions for use (IFU) or printing error to cause a product recall. A trivial issue such as a faulty print ribbon, for example, can lead to missing, unreadable or misinterpreted content.
When this goes undetected and products reach the supply chain, regulations are breached and patient safety is put at risk. Moreover, with an increasing move towards just-in-time production processes, organisations need to ensure they’ve got robust mechanisms in place to assure batch integrity.
Concerningly, most organisations are unlikely to realise that their printing systems don’t comply … until the regulators come knocking.
The most reliable suppliers will be proactive in ensuring system validation, checking that what is required in the URS is delivered without errors and addressing issues such as risk assessment, testing strategies, good document standards and training protocols.
A dedicated, GAMP V trained expert will know exactly what is needed to achieve validation in a pharmaceutical production environment, including the integration of any additional systems — such as a labelling or ERP platform — and will provide the validation pack to support that.
It’s ever more important that a company’s printing system can withstand the scrutiny of an audit. So why leave the compliance of the final component of the validation process to chance?