Meeting patient needs but with streamlined processes

Published: 22-Jul-2014

The industry faces rising costs for clinical trials on drugs designed to treat ever more complex diseases but with lower returns. Susan Birks reports on what is being done to stem the high failure rates and increase transparency

You need to be a subscriber to read this article.
Click here to find out more.

With the most comprehensive survey of clinical success rates across the drug industry to date1 suggesting productivity may be even lower than previous estimates, and other sources quoting failure rates at over 90% for Alzheimer’s drug trials, it is easy find fault with the current clinical trials model. Yet viewed from another angle, the approval rate for new molecular entities and drug applications filed with the FDA has remained fairly constant over the decade,2 so the industry must be doing something right.

The drugs being developed today are targeting many of the least understood, most difficult to treat diseases

The drugs being developed today are targeting many of the least understood, most difficult to treat diseases. Many such drugs are often aimed at older patients, already undergoing several treatment regimes for multiple and complex diseases – diabetes, heart disease, cancer and Alzheimer’s, making end points difficult to achieve.

Some industry estimates suggest that clinical trials account for 40% of overall drug research costs and those costs are rising. A report from market research company Visiongain predicts that the world market for pharma clinical trial services will be worth US$30.6bn in 2015.3 But with fewer blockbuster drugs likely in the future, and growing price pressure from payers, it is important that pharma companies become more efficient and increase the success rate of clinical trials.

Not yet a Subscriber?

This is a small extract of the full article which is available ONLY to premium content subscribers. Click below to get premium content on Manufacturing Chemist.

Subscribe now Already a subscriber? Sign in here.

You may also like